EFL Students’ Perceptions of Social Issues in Famous Works of Art
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Alvarado, L., & García, M. (2008). Características más relevantes del paradigma socio-crítico: su aplicación en investigaciones de educación ambiental y de enseñanza de las ciencias realizadas en el doctorado de educación del instituto pedagógico de Caracas. [Most relevant characteristics of the socio-critical paradigm: Its application in environmental education and science teaching research]. Sapiens: Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 9(2), 187-202.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Avivi, Y. (2006). Room for variation? The experience of Colombian gay asylum seekers and asylees in Miami. Sociedad y Economía, 11. Retrieved from http://sociedadyeconomia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/sye/article/view/158.
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación: la clasificación de las metas educacionales [Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals.] Buenos Aires, AR: El Ateneo.
Cole, R. T. (2011, November 15). Letters: Child abuse victims lose more than innocence [comment]. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/letters/story/2011-11-15/Penn-State-scandal-child-sex-abuse/51225638/1.
Dewey, J. (1934/2008). El arte como experiencia (J. Claramonte, Trans.) [Art as experience]. Barcelona, ES: Paidós.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
Gamboa, R. (2011). El papel de la teoría crítica en la investigación educativa y cualitativa [The role of critical theory in educational qualitative research]. Revista Electrónica Diálogos Educativos, 11(21), 48-64.
Giroux, H. A. (1987). Critical literacy and student experience: Donald Graves’ approach to literacy. Language Arts, 64(2), 175-181.
Hammersley, M. (2005). Close encounters of a political kind: The threat from the evidence-based policy-making and practice movement. Qualitative Researcher, 1, 2-4.
Jensen, J. (2001). Art, the public and Deweyan cultural criticism. In D. K. Perry (Ed.), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 109-126). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 783-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518390600976006.
Layton, R. (2003). Art and agency: A reassessment. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 447-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00158.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pineda, C. (2004). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: The search for a pedagogical alternative to improve English learning. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 9(15), 45-80.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage.
Timulak, L. (2003). Empowerment events in process-experiential psychotherapy of depression: An exploratory qualitative analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 13(4), 443-460.