Language-Building Activities and Variations in Interaction With Mixed-Ability ESL University Learners in a Content-Based Course

Main Article Content

Héctor Manuel Serna Dimas
Erika Ruíz Castellanos

Abstract

The preparation of both language-building activities and a variety of teacher/student interaction patterns increase both oral language participation and content learning in a course of manual therapy with mixed-language ability students. In this article, the researchers describe their collaboration in a content-based course in English with English as a second language learners. The data gathered through lesson plans, sociograms, and student feedback cards showed an increase of students’ involvement in class activities since their concern was to be able to diagnose and treat their future patients’ physical condition through a structured interview for which both careful language elaboration and therapist/patient interaction were essential.

Article Details

How to Cite
Serna Dimas, H. M., & Ruíz Castellanos, E. (2014). Language-Building Activities and Variations in Interaction With Mixed-Ability ESL University Learners in a Content-Based Course. HOW Journal, 21(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.21.1.17
Section
Reports on Pedagogical Experiences
Author Biographies

Héctor Manuel Serna Dimas, Universidad EAN, Bogotá

Héctor Manuel Serna Dimas, PhD, is the research group director in Linguistics, Translation, and Organizational Communication in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universidad EAN, Colombia.

Erika Ruíz Castellanos, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá

Erika Ruíz Castellanos, P.T., is a faculty member in the Rehabilitation Programs in the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at Universidad del Rosario, Colombia.

References

Andrade, M. S. (2010). Increasing accountability: Faculty perspectives on the English language competence of nonnative English speakers. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(3), 221-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315308331295.

Bean, J. C., & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74(1), 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.7403.

Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. New York, NY: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. M. (2007). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hendrick, P., Bond, C., Duncan, E., & Hale, L. (2009). Clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal practice: Students’ conceptualizations. Physical Therapy, 89(5), 430-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080150.

Kagan, S. (1995). We can talk: Cooperative learning in the elementary ESL classroom. CAL Digest. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/kagan001.html.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Liu, J. Y., Chang, Y. J., Yang, F. Y., & Sun, Y. C. (2011). Is what I need what I want? Reconceptualising college students’ needs in English courses for general and specific/academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 271-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.09.002.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Universidad del Rosario, School of Medicine and Health Sciences. (2011). Working papers on academic mobility. Bogotá, CO: Author.