Teachers’ Beliefs and the Integration of Technology in the EFL Class
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over the past few decades, information and communication technologies have been integrated into the language teaching and learning scenario with relatively great success. Accordingly, teachers’ role in this process is fundamental in order to make this integration really relevant for students’ learning. This paper reports the results obtained in a study that was addressed to examine what teachers believe about the effectiveness of using technology in an English program at university level and how these beliefs affect the use of these types of tools in their classes. The research conducted was a qualitative study and the analysis of data revealed that the use of technology-based activities in the English classroom is twofold: reinforcing already studied topics in class and promoting motivation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The qualitative inquiry reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-40.
Griffin, T. D, & Ohlsson, S. (2001). Beliefs vs. knowledge: A necessary distinction for predicting, explaining, and assessing conceptual change. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from http://conferences.inf.ed.ac.uk/cogsci2001/pdf-files/0364.pdf
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
Lin, L. L. (2009). Technology and second language learning. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED505762)
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250-273.
Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-31.
Parr, J. M. (1995). Different paths to the information highway: Factors affecting implementation in New Zealand high schools. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED390375)
Railton, D., & Watson, P. (2005). Teaching Autonomy: “Reading groups” and the development of autonomous learning practices. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(3), 182-193. doi: 10.1177/1469787405057665
Rey, L., & Rosado, N. (2000). Analysis of the relation between the use of e-mail based activities and the development of positive learning attitudes and learning activities in English in intermediate level at Universidad del Norte (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3699409?uid=3737808&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102598343431
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology Innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.