Boys’ and Girls’ Gendered Voices in EFL Debates
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article reports a case study conducted at a school in Bogotá. It was based on constructivist and poststructuralist frameworks that viewed gender positioning as a social construction in foreign language learning contexts (Baxter, 2003; Sunderland, 1992; Tannen, 1996). Aiming to understand how ninth grade gender positioning is constructed, and how gendered discourses emerge in EFL debates, we carried out interviews and observations and analyzed those issues following feminist poststructuralist discourse analysis (FPDA) principles (Baxter, 2008). Findings suggest that learners view themselves as both masculine and feminine, using their interests and behaviors as the principal means of defining their gender positioning discursively in debates in another language (L2).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Baxter, J. (2008). Feminist poststructuralist discourse analysis: A new theoretical and methodological approach? In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 243-255). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bergvall, V. (1999). Towards a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language in Society, 28, 273-293.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Burke, P., Stets, J., & Pirog-Good, M. (1988). Gender identity, self-esteem, and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 272-285.
Castañeda-Peña, H. (2009). Masculinities and femininities go to preschool. Gender positioning in discourse. Bogotá, CO: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
Coates, J., & Cameron, D. (1988). Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. New York, NY: Longman.
Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London, UK: Continuum.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 193-223.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14-31). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227-263). London, UK: Methuen.
Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2010). Femininity, feminism and gendered discourse: A selected and edited collection of papers from the fifth international language and gender association conference (IGALA5). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Law, K. W. K., & Chan, A. H. N. (2004). Gender role stereotyping in Hong Kong’s primary school Chinese language subject textbooks. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 10(1), 49-69.
Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2000). Positioning in practice: Understanding participation in the social world. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4), 435-453.
Nichols, P. C. (1999). The role of social networks and the strength of weak ties in changing language policy: Gender neutralization in American English. In T. Huebner, & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 347–360). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pavlenko, A. (2004). Gender and sexuality in foreign and second language education: Critical and feminist approaches. In B. Norton, & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 53-71). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Philips, S. U. (1980). Sex differences and language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 523–544.
Philips, S. U., Steele, S., & Tanz, C. (1987). Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stets, J., & Burke, P. (2000). Femininity/Masculinity [Adobe Digital Editions version]. Retrieved from: http://wat2146.ucr.edu/Papers/00b.pdf
Sunderland, J. (1992). Gender in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 46(1), pp. 81-91. Retrieved from: http://203.72.145.166/elt/files/46-1-10.Pdf
Sunderland, J. (2004). Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English language education. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Sunderland, J., Cowley, M., Rahim, A, Leontzakou, C, & Shattuck, J. (2002). From representation towards discursive practices: gender in the foreign language textbook revisited. In L. Litosseliti, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 233-255). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing.
Tannen, D. (1993). Introduction. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (1996). Gender and discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (Eds.). (1983). Language, gender, and society. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Yamakawa, Y., Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2005). Role of positioning: The role of positioning in constructing an identity in a third grade mathematics classroom. [Adobe Digital Editions version] Retrieved from: http://www.learnlab.org/research/wiki/images/b/be/Yamakawa_role_of_positioning.pdf
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The mediation of social identity through academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1990) Schoolgirl fictions. London, UK: Verso.
Walkerdine, V. (1998). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.