Iranian L2 Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics

Main Article Content

Zhila Gharaveisi
Adel Dastgoshadeh

Abstract

This study aims at exploring L2 researchers’ perspectives on research ethics in Iran. A total of ten teacher researchers were selected among a larger group of researchers based on the criteria of academic degree and familiarity with research principles. They were interviewed about different aspects of research ethics. Their responses were audio-recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Finally, the emerging themes were extracted from the responses which showed plagiarism, data management, participant rights, and authorship rights as the most frequent themes discussed by the respondents. Furthermore, the extent of the participants’ self-expressed adherence to ethical considerations in research was differential, ranging from a minimum amount of adherence to an acceptable degree of adherence and commitment to research ethics. In addition, the results showed that not all participants had a clear understanding and definition of the four major themes which emerged from the results.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gharaveisi, Z., & Dastgoshadeh, A. (2020). Iranian L2 Researchers’ Perspectives on Research Ethics. HOW Journal, 27(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.474
Section
Research Reports
Author Biographies

Zhila Gharaveisi, Islamic Azad University

Zhila Gharaveisi has received her MA in TEFL from Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Iran. She has taught English language in different institutes for more than nine years.

Adel Dastgoshadeh, Islamic Azad University

Adel Dastgoshadeh is an Assistant Professor at the Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Iran. He holds a Ph.D in TEFL. He has published and presented a number of articles in different journals and conferences. His areas of interest include discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and teacher education.

References

Aba-Sha'ar, M. Y. (2017). Research ethics: A principal view. India: Aligarh Muslim University, U.P.
Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(2), 151-170.
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal, 89(iii), 353-366.
Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: an analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 117-122.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2007). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gottlieb, A. (1997). Comments on ethical issues in qualitative research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA.
Hoepfl, M. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47-63.
Hoy, A. (2008). Commentary: What motivates teachers? Important work on a complex question. Learning and Instruction, 18, 492-498.
Hiver, P. H. (2010). The interplay of possible language teacher selves in professional development choices: A qualitative study (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nottingham, UK.
Kelman, H. C. (2007). Foreword. In A. J. Kimmel, Ethical issues in behavioral research: Basic and applied perspectives (pp. xii-xiv). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kimmel, A. J. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioral research: Basic and applied perspectives. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA).
Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A., Khoshroo, F., & Barkat, B. (2012). An investigation of Iranian EFL Masters students’ perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(2), 69-85.
Mehrani, M. B. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers’ conceptions of research: An explanatory mixed methods approach. RALs, 7(1), 95-117.
Newman, P., & Ratliff, M. (2001). Introduction. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 1-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 427-443.
Rezanejad, A., & Rezaei, S. (2013). Academic dishonesty at universities: The case of plagiarism among Iranian language students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(4), 275-295. Springer Science and Business Media Dordrech.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z. (2009). Gaining insights into teachers’ ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323-335.
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.