Language and Literacy Practices in Teacher Education: Contributions from a Local Agenda

Main Article Content

Amparo Clavijo-Olarte


Language and literacy practices in teacher education are decisive in the education of future language teachers. In this article, I share my beliefs as a teacher educator about language and literacy practices constructed with teachers in Bogota. Thus, my intention is to weave my professional narrative through the connections I can make from theory and praxis to explain teachers´ understandings of language and literacy through their life and literacy experiences and the way they organize their practice as language teachers. My research trajectory of thirty years documenting the local literacy practices within the research area of literacy studies and local pedagogies for social transformation has significantly informed my practice. University-school partnerships and international collaborations for research and teaching in Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Manchester, in the USA, and Dundee, in the UK, have nurtured me personally and professionally. My understanding of literacy as a social practice evolved to critical literacies and I developed knowledge in community pedagogies and city semiotic landscapes through reflections and collaborations via working with teachers. Community-based pedagogies (CBPs) invite teachers to see their life and work in relation to places they live and teach as meaningful content for linguistic, social, cultural, ecological, and economic resources to inspire students´ inquiries and teachers´ transformative practices. The city semiotic landscapes are powerful literacies for language learning; therefore, they currently adhere to the research group´s agenda (2019-2021). I describe my understandings, contributions, and suggestions as concerns in the field of teacher education in Colombia. My conclusions raise awareness about the need to address these topics in teacher education programs in Colombia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Clavijo-Olarte, A. (2021). Language and Literacy Practices in Teacher Education: Contributions from a Local Agenda. HOW Journal, 28(3), 47-61.
Reflections and Revision of Themes
Author Biography

Amparo Clavijo-Olarte, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

She is a professor of literacy and qualitative research and a researcher in the areas of Local Literacies and Teacher Education at Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas in Bogotá, Colombia. Her most current research is on the city as curriculum: opportunities for literacies, ethnography, and pedagogy of place.


Canagarajah, A. S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Routledge.
Clavijo, A. (2015). Implementing community-based pedagogies with teachers in Co¬lombia to enhance the English curriculum. In M. Perales & M. Méndez (Eds.), Experiencias de docencia e investigación en lenguas extranjeras (pp. 31-43). Editorial Universidad Quintana Roo.
Clavijo, A., & Torres, E. (1999). Memorias del Congreso Colombiano de Lecto-escritura en lengua materna y lengua extranjera para un nuevo siglo. Cargraphic.
Clavijo-Olarte, A., & Austin, T. (Forthcoming). Crossing multilingual boundaries with powerful literacies: A collaborative ethnography in the linguistic and socio-economic landscape of downtown Bogotá. In A. de Mejía, N. Miranda, & S. Valencia Giraldo (Eds.), Critical perspectives and voices from the field in multilingual Colombia.
Clavijo-Olarte, A., & Galindo, L. M. R. (2019). Las pedagogías de la comunidad a través de investigaciones locales en el contexto urbano de Bogotá. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Clavijo-Olarte, A., & González, Á. P. (2016). The missing voices in Colombia bilingue: The case of Embera children’s schooling in Bogotá, Colombia. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Honoring Richard Ruiz and his work on language planning and bilingual education (pp. 431-458). Multilingual Matters.
Comber, B. (2015). Critical literacy and social justice. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(5), 362-367.
Comber, B. (2018). Community-based approaches to foreign language education. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J., 20(2), 153-160.
Comber, B., & Kamler*, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching education, 15(3), 293-310.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. Narratives of Experience. Teachers College Press.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy. Reading the word and the world. Bergin and Garvey.
Gómez, J. (2016). Collaborative inquiry as a way to promote elementary students’ reflections in the EFL classroom [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Gómez, M. D. (2020). Multimodal texts production in language teacher education school family connections in times of Covid-19 [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
González, A. P. (2014). Embera immigrant children schooling process in Bogotá [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Goodman, Y. M. (1980). The roots of literacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Claremont Reading Conference (47th, Claremont, CA, January 18-19, 1980).
Gutiérrez, D. (2020). Problematizing the community: Voices from secondary school students [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Hernández Varona, W., & Gutiérrez Álvarez, D. F. (2020). English language student-teachers developing agency through community-based pedagogy projects. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(1), 109-122.
Hudelson, S. (1984). Kan yu ret an rayt en ingles: Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 18(2), 221-238.
Hudelson, S. (1989). Write On: Children writing in ESL. Prentice Hall Regents.
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2011). The transformative power of narrative in second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 486-509.
Lozano, M. E., Jiménez-Caicedo, J. P., & Lee, B. A. (2020). Linguistic landscape projects in language teaching: Opportunities for critical language learning beyond the classroom. In D. Malinowski et al., (Eds.), Language teaching in the linguistic landscape, educational linguistics. Springer.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teach¬ing: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
Mora, R. A., Pulgarín, C., Ramírez, N., & Mejía-Vélez, M. C. (2018). English literacies in Medellín: The city as literacy. In S. Nichols & S. Dobson (Eds.), Learning cit¬ies: Cultural studies and transdisciplinarity in education (pp. 37-60). Springer Nature.
Murrell, P. (2001). The community teacher: A new framework for effective urban teaching. Teachers’ College Press.
Nieto, Y. (2020). Promoting the use of local literacies among EFL university teachers: Sources to connect curriculum and teaching [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175-196.
Rincón, J., & Clavijo-Olarte, A. (2016). Fostering EFL learners’ literacies through local inqui¬ry in a multimodal experience. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J., 18(2), 67-82.
Rodríguez, A. (2021). EFL learners’ agency exploring the sociocultural landscape of a public university [Unpublished master thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE journal, 8(2), 15-34.
Schecter, S., Solomon, P., & Kittmer, L. (2003). Integrating teacher education in a com¬munity-situated school agenda. In S. Schecter & J. Cummins (Eds.), Multilingual education in practice: Using diversity as a resource (pp. 81-96). Heinemann.
Sharkey, J. (2012). Community based pedagogies and literacies in teacher education: Promising beginnings, intriguing challenges. Ikala, 17(1), 9-13.
Sharkey, J., & Clavijo, A. (2012). Community-based pedagogies: Projects and possibilities in Colombia and the United States. In A. Honigsfeld & A. Cohan (Eds.), Breaking the Mold of Education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 129-137). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Sharkey, J., Clavijo, A., & Ramírez, M. (2016). Developing a deeper understanding of community-based pedagogies with teachers: Learning with and from teachers in Colombia. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(3), 1-14.
Street, B. (1995). Social Literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. Longman.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51-85).
Zeichner, K., Payne, K. A., & Brayko, K. (2014). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 122-135.
Zeichner, K., Payne, K., & Brayko, K. (2012). Democratizing knowledge in university teacher education through practice-based methods teaching and mediated field experience in schools and communities. Harvard Educational Review, 1-46.