Using SFL as a Tool for Analyzing Students’ Narratives

Main Article Content

Doris Correa
Camilo Domínguez

Abstract

Traditionally, at universities, English as a foreign language instructors have used a series of approaches to teach students how to write academic texts in English from both teacher preparation and regular programs. In spite of this, students continue to have problems writing the academic texts required of them in the different courses. Concerned with this issue, a group of English as a Foreign Language writing instructors from a Teacher Education Program in Medellín engaged in the study of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The purpose of this article is to report the insights that one of these instructors gained once he began using these theories to analyze a narrative text produced by one of the students in his class.

Article Details

How to Cite
Correa, D., & Domínguez, C. (2014). Using SFL as a Tool for Analyzing Students’ Narratives. HOW, 21(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.21.2.7
Section
Reports on Pedagogical Experiences
Author Biographies

Doris Correa, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín

Doris Correa holds a Doctorate degree in Language, Literacy, and Culture from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Currently, she works as an Associate Professor at the School of Languages, Universidad de Antioquia (Colombia), where she has done research in English language policy, critical literacies, systemic functional linguistics, and linguistic landscapes.

Camilo Domínguez, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín

Camilo Domínguez is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning at Universidad de Antioquia (Medellín, Colombia), where he currently works as an EFL instructor. He is a member of the GIAE Research Group and has done research in areas such as critical literacies and linguistic landscapes.

References

Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Oteíza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8-24.

Artunduaga Cuéllar, M. T. (2013). Process writing and the development of grammatical competence. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 20(1), 11-35.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2006). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. National Center for English language Teaching and Research, Sydney, AU: Macquarie University.

Cárdenas, M. L., Nieto, M. C., & Martin, Y. M. (2005). Conditions for monograph projects by preservice teachers: Lessons from the long and winding route. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 7, 75-94.

Cárdenas, M. L., Nieto, M. C., Bellanger, V., Cortés, L., & Ruger, A. (2005). La problemática de los trabajos monográficos en un programa de licenciatura en idiomas: Análisis y perspectivas [Problems in monographs from an undergraduate program in languages: Analysis and perspectives]. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 10(16), 315-342.

Chala, P. A., & Chapetón, C. M. (2013). The role of genre-based activities in the writing of argumentative essays in EFL. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 15(2), 127-147.

Chapetón, C. M., & Chala, P. A. (2013). Undertaking the act of writing as a situated social practice: Going beyond the linguistic and the textual. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(1), 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.1.a02.

Cheng, F. W. (2008). Scaffolding language, scaffolding writing: A genre approach to teaching narrative writing. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(2), 167-191.

Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring how texts work. Newtown, AU: Primary English Teaching Association.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London, UK: Continuum.

Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6.

Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Cox, B. E. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 247-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_1.

Fawcett, S., & Sandberg, A. (1996). Evergreen: A guide to writing with readings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.

Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney, AU: University of New South Wales Press.

Rivera Barreto, A. M. (2011). Improving writing through stages. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 18(1), 11-23.

Robayo Luna, A. M., & Hernandez Ortiz, L. S. (2013). Collaborative writing to enhance academic writing development through project work. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 20(1), 130-148.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32(2), 182-211.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, UK: Arnold.

Zúñiga, G., & Macías, D. F. (2006). Refining students’ academic writing skills in an undergraduate foreign language teaching program. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 11(17), 311-336.