The Effect of Teachers’ Age on Their Beliefs about Action Research: Implications for Second Language Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite the growing body of studies on action research (AR) in second/foreign language (L2) education, little is known about teachers’ beliefs about AR among different age groups. Hence, this study investigates whether L2 teachers’ beliefs about AR vary by considering teachers’ age. The Inventory on Teachers’ Beliefs about Action Research (ITBAR) is a specifically designed questionnaire to investigate the matter and was distributed to 157 Iranian ELT teachers. Then 120 teachers were randomly divided into three age groups, namely starters (20–34 years), middle-aged (35–49 years), and seniors (50+). A one-way ANOVA test was used to test whether the difference among the groups was significant. The findings showed that teachers can experience age effects in the demanding teaching profession. According to the data, younger teachers had the highest mean scores for their beliefs about AR in comparison to their middle-aged and senior colleagues. This might be attributed to the different perspectives of these teachers toward professional development, the role of pre-service teacher programs, and the familiarity of senior teachers with the limitations of conducting AR in real classroom contexts. It is then suggested that designing collaborative AR projects between beginning and senior teachers and institutional support might lead to more fruitful and positive results.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24, 61-81.
Aras, S. (2020). Action research as an inquiry-based teaching practice model for teacher education programs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 33, 1-16.
Atay, D. (2006). Teachers' professional development: Partnerships in research. TESL-EJ, 10(2), 1-15.
Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139-147.
Auerbach, E. (1994). Participatory action research. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 693-697.
Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Topics, aims, and constraints in English teacher research: A Chinese case study. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 113-125.
Borg, S. (2006) Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. Continuum.
Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 731-747.
Borg, S. (2008). English language teachers' beliefs about research: Perspectives from the Netherlands. Levende Talen, 9(3), 3-13.
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers' conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30, 355-388.
Borg, S. (2015). Researching teachers’ beliefs. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 487-504). Bloomsbury.
Borg, S. (2019). Language teacher cognition: Perspectives and debates. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-23). Springer.
Borg, S., & Sánchez, H. S. (2015). Key issues in doing and supporting language teacher research. In S. Borg & H. S. Sánchez (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 1-13). Palgrave Macmillan.
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 367-409.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns, & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 289-297). Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A., & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2006). Conducting action research in Indonesia: Illustrations and implications. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 21-35.
Burns, A., Westmacott, A., & Hidalgo Ferrer, A. (2016). Initiating an action research program for university EFL teachers: Early experiences and responses. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 55-73.
Campbell, C., & Tovar, D. (2006). Action research as a professional development tool for teachers and administrators. Applied Language Learning, 16(1), 75-80.
Chou, C. (2011). Teachers' professional development: Investigating teachers' learning to do action research in a professional learning community. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20 (3), 421-437.
Clarke, P. A., & Fournillier, J. B. (2012). Action research, pedagogy, and activity theory: Tools facilitating two instructors’ interpretations of the professional development of four pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 649–660.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as a stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Crawford-Garrett, K., Anderson, S., Grayson, A., & Suter, C. (2015). Transformational practice: Critical teacher research in pre-service teacher education. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 479-496.
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers. Applied Linguistics, 14, 130-144.
Crookes, G. (1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? Modern Language Journal, 81, 67-79.
Crookes, G., & Chandler, P. (2001). Introducing action research into the education of postsecondary foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 131-140.
Dassa, L., & Nichols, B. (2020). Making the move: Empowering student teachers as teacher researchers. The Teacher Educator, 55, 267-282.
Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., & Mujtaba, T. (2006). Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. Department for Education and Skills.
Dehghan, F., & Sahragard, R. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers’ views on action research and its application in their classrooms: A case study. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 4(1), 39-52.
Edge, J. (2005). Continuing cooperative development. The University of Michigan Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Continuum Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2014). “I feel like I’ve plateaued professionally…gone a little stale”: Mid-career reflections in a teacher discussion group. Reflective Practice, 15, 504-517.
Farrell, T. S. C., & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 594–610.
Ginns, I., Heirdsfield, A., Atweh, B., & Watters, J. J. (2001). Beginning teachers becoming professionals through action research. Educational Action Research, 9(1), 111-133.
Guglielmi, D., Bruni, I., Simbula, S., Fraccaroli, F., & Depolo, M. (2016). What drives teacher engagement: A study of different age cohorts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 323-340.
Hadley, G. (2003). Action research in action. SEAMEO Regional English Language Center.
Hatch, A., Greer, T., & Bailey, K. (2007). Student-produced action research in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 27(2), 205-212.
Huberman, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: Some intersections. In T. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 193–224). Teachers College Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–604). Sage.
Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to pre-service teachers. Action Research, 6(1), 7-28.
Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2000). The action research process as a means of helping student teachers understand and fulfill the complex role of the teacher. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 115-136.
Kuzborska, I. (2011). Links between teachers’ beliefs and practices and research on reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23, 102–128.
Lattimer, H. (2012). Action research in pre-service teacher education: Is there value added? Inquiry in Education, 3(1), 1-25.
Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Beginning teachers who stay: Beliefs about students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 31-43.
Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on pre-service and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135-149.
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge.
Mehrani, M. B. (2014). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Voice of mediators. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 21-38.
Mehrani, M. B. (2017). A narrative study of Iranian EFL teachers’ experiences of doing action research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 93-112.
Mehrpour, S., & Moghaddam, M. (2018). Exploring novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers’ beliefs representations: A more vivid picture. International Journal of Language Studies, 12(2), 17-50.
Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C., & Logue, M. E. (2009). Benefits of collaborative action research for the beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 344-349.
Moran, M. J. (2007). Collaborative action research and project work: Promising practices for developing collaborative inquiry among early childhood pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 418-431.
Phillips, D., & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a Teacher through Action Research. Routledge.
Poon, A. Y. K. (2008). How action research can complement formal language teacher education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 43-62.
Price, J. N., & Valli, L. (2005). Pre-service teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 57-72.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V., Ghonsooly, B., & Pishghadam, R. (2017). A mixed methods research on teachers’ beliefs about action research in second language education. International Journal of Action Research, 13(1), 75-94.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V., Ghonsooly, B., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). A practical model for integrating action research time into second language education schedule. International Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 52-66.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V., Ghonsooly, B., & Pishghadam, R. (2019). Second language teachers’ reasons for doing/not doing action research in their classrooms. International Journal of Action Research, 15(3), 255-273.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V., Ghonsooly, B., & Pishghadam, R. (2021). Development and validation of an Inventory on Teachers’ Beliefs about Action Research (ITBAR) in second language education. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(5), 428-441.
Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 65-91.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Rock, R. C., & Levin, B. B. (2002). Collaborative action research projects: Enhancing pre-service teacher development in professional development schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 7-21.
Sato, E., & Chen, J. C. (2019). Rise to the occasion: The trajectory of a novice Japanese teacher’s first online teaching through action research. Language Teaching Research, 23, 1-24.
Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 797-816.
Sayer, P. (2005). An intensive approach to building conversation skills. ELT Journal, 59(1), 14-22.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Arena.
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ghasemi, Z. (2017). EFL teachers’ beliefs and their actual classroom practices: Any difference? Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9(2), 173-208.
Steffy, B., & Wolfe, M. (2001). A life-cycle model for career teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38, 16–19.
Tedick, D., & Walker, C. (1995). From theory to practice: How do we prepare teachers for second language classrooms? Foreign Language Annals, 28, 499-517.
Ulvik, M. (2014). Student-teachers doing action research in their practicum: Why and how? Educational Action Research, 22(4), 518-533.
Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2006). Age differences in career activities among higher-level employees in the Netherlands: A comparison between profit sector and non-profit sector staff. International Journal of Training and Development, 10, 98-120.
Volk, K. (2009). Action research as a sustainable endeavor for teachers. Action Research, 8(3), 315-332.
Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Wyatt, M. (2011). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65(4), 417-425.