The Exercise of Learner Autonomy in a Virtual EFL Course in Colombia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This case study explores how a group of graduate students manifest autonomy in an English as a Foreign Language virtual course at a Colombian university. Analysis of questionnaires, forums, and interviews showed that students manifested attitudes that led to autonomy such as motivation and commitment at the beginning of the course, but they also manifested high levels of dependence and lack of self-confidence. Later, they became more confident and performed more independently, two attitudes closely-related to autonomy. Furthermore, the results show that factors such as course design, the platform, and the teacher’s role influenced the students’ exercise of autonomy. Finally, the need for designing virtual English as a Foreign Language courses that promote autonomous learning and the teachers’ and the students’ roles in virtual environments are discussed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Ardila, M. E., & Bedoya, J. R. (2006). La inclusión de la plataforma de aprendizaje en línea MOODLE en un curso de gramática contrastiva español-inglés [The inclusion of the online learning platform MOODLE in a contrastive grammar course]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 11(17), 181-205.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Benson, P. (2010). Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test? In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 77-97). Reading, UK: University of Reading.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (Eds.). (1997). Autonomy and independence in language learning. London, UK: Longman.
Blin, F. (2005). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: An activity theoretical study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Open University, United Kingdom.
Bordonaro, K. (2003). Perceptions of technology and manifestations of language learner autonomy. CALL-EJ Online, 5(1). Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/5-1/ bordonaro.html.
Candy, P.C. (1989). Constructivism and the study of self-direction in adult learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 21(2), 95-116.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Cuasialpud, R. E. (2010). Indigenous students’ attitudes towards learning English through a virtual program: A study in a Colombian public university. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(2), 133-152.
Cuesta, L. (2010). The design and development of online course materials: Some features and recommendations. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 12(1), 181-201.
Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1996). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Fanany, R. (2005). Autonomous learning through online teaching. PacCALL Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.117.9652&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Figura, K., & Jarvis, H. (2007). Computer-based materials: A study of learner autonomy and strategies. System, 35(4), 448-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.07.001.
Gonzalez, D., & St. Louis, R. (2008). The use of Web 2.0 tools to promote learner autonomy. Independence, 43, 28-32. Retrieved from http://peoplelearn.homestead.com/MEdHOME2/Technology/WebToos.2.0.autonomy.pdf.
Healey, D. (2002). Learner autonomy with technology: What do language learners need to be successful? TESOL 2002, CALL-IS Academic Session.
Kourtis-Kazoullis, V. (2008). From theory to practice: The creation of an internet-based language learning environment for academic language proficiency in Greek as a second language. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 289-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501220802283160.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London, UK. Sage Publications.
Lai, J. (2001). Towards an analytic approach to assessing learner autonomy. The AILA Review, 15, 34-44.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin, IE: Authentik.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0.
Motteram, G. (1997). Learner Autonomy and the Web. In V. Darleguy et al. (Eds.), Educational technology in language learning: Theoretical considerations and practical applications (pp. 17-24). Lyon, FR: INSA.
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). London; UK: Longman.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Pegrum, M. (2009). Communicative networking and linguistic mashups on Web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 20-41). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch002.
Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 35-53). London, UK: Longman.
Rivers, W. P. (2001). Autonomy at all costs: An ethnography of metacognitive self-assessment and self-management among experienced language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 279-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00109.
Ruiz, M. N. (2005). Learner autonomy in computer-assisted language learning: A comparative case study of learners’ behaviors in the English as a foreign language context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Jaume I, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/10440.
Schwienhorst, K. (2008). CALL and autonomy: Settings and contexts variables in technology-enhanced language environments. Independence, 43, 13-15.
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf.
Sotillo, S. M. (2002). Constructivist and collaborative learning in a wireless environment. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 16-20.
Vargas, M., Cabrales, J., & Marrugo, I. (2010). La autonomía en el aprendizaje del inglés y su relación con los trabajos independientes asignados a los estudiantes [Autonomy in English language learning and its relationship to students’ independent assignments]. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 15(26), 119-150.