Tutoría virtual entre pares: un ímpetu renovado para el aprendizaje autónomo del inglés
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Los desafíos que enfrentaba un modelo de tutoría presencial entre pares se convirtieron en una oportunidad para integrar la virtualidad al aprendizaje autónomo del inglés en dos programas de licenciatura en una universidad pública colombiana. Este estudio cualitativo examina cómo la exposición a un ambiente de aprendizaje virtual moldea la autonomía de un grupo de tutoriados. A partir de cuestionarios, una entrevista de grupo focal, registros de reflexiones y de uso de recursos de internet, los investigadores identificaron un cambio en la conceptualización de aprendizaje autónomo y un impacto en las prácticas autodirigidas de los participantes como resultado de la inmediatez, accesibilidad, comodidad y disponibilidad de los recursos que el modelo tutoría virtual favorece.
Detalles del artículo
Los contenidos de la revista HOW se publican bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional. Usted es libre para copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato siempre y cuando usted otorgue el crédito de manera apropiada. Usted no puede hacer uso del material con fines comerciales. Si usted mezcla, transforma o crea nuevo material a partir de esta obra, usted no podrá distribuir el material modificado. Más información: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es.
Se solicitará a los autores cuyos artículos se aceptan para publicación en HOW que firmen una cesión de derechos no exclusiva con el fin de permitir a ASOCOPI reproducir el texto completo en el internet o en cualquier otro medio disponible. Los autores conservan los derechos sobre sus manuscritos con las siguientes restricciones: el derecho de primera publicación es otorgado a ASOCOPI; los autores pueden establecer acuerdos no exclusivos con terceros siempre y cuando la publicación original en la revista HOW sea reconocida adecuadamente.
Citas
Álvarez, P. (2002). La función tutorial en la universidad. Madrid: EOS.
Ariza, J., & Viáfara, J. (2009). Interweaving autonomous learning and peer-tutoring in coaching EFL student-teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 85–104.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorenson, C., & Razavieh, A. (2008). Introduction to research in education (8th Ed.). California, EU: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language teaching, 40(1), 21-40.
Brooke, M. (2013). Facilitating the development of the autonomous language learner using online virtual learning environments. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(4), 572–580. http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.4.572-580
Cardozo, C. E. (2011). Tutoría entre pares como una estrategia pedagógica universitaria. Educ. Educ., 14(2), 309–325.
Cheng, Y. (2017). Cultivation of college students’ autonomous English learning ability in IT environment based on project-based learning platform. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería, 32(9), 100-105.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: Inefficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York: Springer.
Dekhinet, R. (2008). Online enhanced corrective feedback for ESL learners in higher education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 409-425.
Dekhinet, R., Topping, K., Duran, D., & Blanch, S. (2008). Let me learn with my peers online! Foreign language learning through reciprocal peer tutoring. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), 1-9.
Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 179-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.002
Evans, M. J., & Moore, J. S. (2013). Peer tutoring with the aid of the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 144-155.
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 4-11.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 175–188. http://doi.org/10.11139/cj.25.2.175-188
Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D., & Lock, D. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1-23.
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.
Liu, X. (2014). Influence of motivation, autonomy and online environment on listening skills of elementary and intermediate learners of English. International Education Studies, 7(7), 19–28.
Clarkson, B., & Luca, J. (2002). Promoting student learning through peer tutoring – A case study. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1176-1181). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Miyakoda, H., Kaneko, K. I., Ishikawa, M., & Shinagawa, N. (2010). Online multilingual vocabulary system and its application in L2 learning. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 3(1), 15-36.
Murphey, T., & Jacobs, G. M. (2000). Encouraging critical collaborative autonomy.
JALT Journal, 22, 220-244.
Nunan, D. (2003). Nine steps to learner autonomy. Symposium, 193-204.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 701-728.
Simpson, O. (2002). Supporting students in open and distance learning. London: Kogan.
Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.004
Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first. Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 245-266.
Sutrisno, D. (2016, May). Developing autonomous learning using web 2.0 in a digital age: Building language learners’ content knowledge and improving writing skills. Paper presented at the 2nd international seminar on educational technology, Semarang, Indonesia.
Taylor, K. (2006). Autonomy and self-directed learning: A developmental journey. In C. Hoare (Ed.), Handbook of adult development and learning (pp. 196-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
Thurston, A., Duran, D., Cunningham, E., Blanch, S., & Topping, K. (2009). International on-line reciprocal peer tutoring to promote modern language development in primary schools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 462-472.
Tolosa, C., Ordóñez, C. L., & Alfonso, T. (2015). Online peer feedback between Colombian and New Zealand FL beginners: A comparison and lessons learned. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 73-86.
Tomes, N. (2001) Technology-supported collaborative learning. In N. Falchicov (Ed.), Learning Together- Peer Tutoring in Higher Education (pp. 275–291). London: Falmer.
Topping, K. J., Dehkinet, R., Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., & Duran, D. (2013). Paradoxical effects of feedback in international online reciprocal peer tutoring. Computers & Education, 61, 225-231.
Verba, M. (1998). Tutoring interactions between young children: How symmetry can modify asymmetrical interactions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 195-216.
Viáfara, J. (2014). EFL student teachers’ learning in a peer-tutoring research study group. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2), 201-212.
Viáfara, J., & Ariza, A. (2008). Un modelo tutorial entre compañeros como apoyo al aprendizaje autónomo del inglés. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 13(19), 173–209.
Warschauer, M., & Liaw, M. (2011). Emerging technologies for autonomous language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 107-118.
Wong, H. (2011). Enhancing learner autonomy in an on-line editing programme. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 153-169.
Wong, J., & Fauverge, A. (1999). Leverage - Reciprocal peer tutoring over broadband networks. ReCALL, 11(1), 133–142.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.