Mejora de la comprensión lectora mediante un método de lectura intensiva

Contenido principal del artículo

Andrés Insuasty Cárdenas
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-5627

Resumen

Este artículo trata de un proyecto que explora la efectividad de la lectura intensiva para mejorar la comprensión lectora de un grupo de estudiantes universitarios en Pasto (Colombia). En el estado inicial, un examen diagnóstico, diario de campo y tres encuestas permitieron identificar las necesidades de los estudiantes. Durante la fase de intervención, se aplicaron talleres y exámenes que mostraron el impacto de las estrategias de comprensión de lectura. En la fase de evaluación, se analizaron cuatro instrumentos (exámenes de lectura, diario del profesor, cuestionarios a estudiantes y un pre y post test) para revisar los resultados y opiniones de los estudiantes. Al finalizar este proyecto, los resultados muestran que las estrategias mejoraron la comprensión lectora porque les permitió sortear los problemas encontrados antes de la fase de intervención.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Insuasty Cárdenas, A. (2020). Mejora de la comprensión lectora mediante un método de lectura intensiva. HOW Journal, 27(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.518
Sección
Reportes de investigación
Biografía del autor/a

Andrés Insuasty Cárdenas, Institución Universitaria CESMAG

Andrés Insuasty Cárdenas holds a BA in English and French from Universidad de Nariño, Colombia, and an MA in English Didactics from Universidad de Caldas, Colombia. He is a part‑time English language teacher at different universities in Pasto. He is interested in teaching reading and writing to university students.

Citas

Adler, C. R. (Ed.) (2004). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read (3rd Ed.). U.S.: National Institute for Literacy.

Alyousef, H. S. (2005). Teaching reading comprehension to ESL/EFL learners. Language Learning Journal, 5(1), 143-154.

Anderson, N. (2008). Active skills for reading book 4. (2nd Ed.) Massachusetts: Heinle Cengage Center.

Antonacci, A. P., & O’Callaghan, C. M. (2011). Developing content area literacy: 40 strategies for middle and secondary classrooms. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Behroozizad, S., & Habibollahiaghdam, M., (2018). Directed reading-thinking activity and reading comprehension. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 11(22), 111-126.

Biringkanae, A. (2018). The use of SQ3R technique in improving students` reading comprehension. ELS-Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(2), 218-225.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.) New York: Pearson Education.

Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. New York: Longman Inc.

Dreher, M., & Gray, J. (2009). Compare, contrast, comprehend: using compare-contrast text structures with ELLs in K-3 classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 132-141.

Evans, N., Hartshorn, K., & Anderson, N. (2010). A research based approach to materials development for reading. In N. Harwood (Ed), Materials in ELT: Theory in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: UK. Pearson Longman.

Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching reading and writing: A guidebook for tutoring and remediating students. Maryland, US: R&L Education.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R. (1992). The action research planner (3rd Ed.). Australia: Springer.

Khoshbakht, F., & Gorjian, B. (2017). Using authentic materials in teaching reading comprehension to EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(2), 48-54.

Kuhn, M., & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21.

Lewis, M., & Hill, J. (1992). Practical techniques for language teaching. London: Language Teaching Publications.

Mart, C. (2015). Combining extensive and intensive reading to reinforce language learning. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(4), 85-90.

Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of language learning strategy use: Interpretations from information-processing theory and social psychology. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 11-22.

Ogle, D. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 40, 564-570.

Pang, S., et al. (2003). Teaching Reading. Geneva: International Bureau Educational.

Paran, A. (2003). Intensive reading English. Teaching Professional, 28, 40-48.

Praveen, S., & Rajan, P. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESL students. English Language Teaching, 6, 155-170.

Professional Development Service for Teachers PSDT (2014). The Reading Process: A Guide to the Teaching and Learning of Reading. Dublin, 2014. Available at: https://pdst.ie/sites/default/files/15.%20The%20Reading%20Process.pdf

Ruddell, M. R., & Shearer, B. A. (2002). “Extraordinary,” “tremendous,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent”: Middle school at-risk students become avid word learners with the vocabulary self-collection strategy (VSS). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(5), 352–363.

Stoller, F., Anderson, N., Grabe, W., & Komiyama, R. (2013). Instructional enhancements to improve students’ reading abilities. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2-33.

Stricklin, K. (2011). Hands-on reciprocal teaching: A comprehension technique. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 620-625.

Toprak, E.L, & Almacıoğlu, G. (2009). Three Reading Phases and Their Applications in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Reading Classes with Young Learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 5 (1), 21-36.